PRODUCTS

BATTERIES

PACKAGING

CARPET

PAINT

FLUORESCENTS

PHARMACEUTICALS

GAS CYLINDERS

SHARPS

MATTRESSES

SOLAR PANELS

TEXTILES

THERMOSTATS

TOBACCO

The Problem

Studies show that people store used, dead, or corroded batteries because they inherently know they have value and should not be thrown in the trash. Some states, including California, have banned batteries from trash disposal. It’s time to provide consumers with a convenient way to recycle those batteries and put that valuable resource back into the economic mainstream, creating jobs in the process. Like most used products, batteries should be seen as a commodity and a business opportunity, not waste!

According to the California Integrated Waste Management Board’s 2002 report Household Universal Waste Generation in California, more than 500 million batteries were sold in California in 2001. Only 0.55% of these were recycled through city and county household hazardous waste programs and at a significant cost to ratepayers and taxpayers; costs were estimated to exceed $31 million per year!

Supporting Battery Stewardship

In this video, Assembly Member Das Williams explains the problems associated with battery disposal and discusses his 2014 legislation, AB 2284, which would have established a statewide stewardship program for household batteries. In 2020, CPSC co-sponsored legislation, AB 1509, addressing producer responsibility in safe battery management, which was reintroduced in 2021 as SB 289. Read more about CPSC-sponsored legislation.

Taking Action

In 2018, Assemblymember Bloom sent three letters regarding Lithium Ion batteries in consumer products. One letter to CalRecycle, one to CalFire, and one to Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), each addressing the health and safety hazards associated with mishandling of lithium ion batteries.

In 2013, 27 environmental organizations asked battery and lamp manufacturers to form a partnership to establish much needed take-back programs for their products:

Environmental Groups Press Rayovac for Battery Recycling – Catherine Kavanaugh, Waste & Recycling News, 8/1/13

In 2011, CPSC was the primary grant partner on the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments’ (SGVCG) pilot project to demonstrate how battery manufacturers can design a statewide stewardship program that provides convenient battery collection locations. The project found that 59 percent of Californians surveyed were aware of the disposal ban on batteries – but 56 percent still threw them in the trash.

Corporate Stewardship

Power by Go Green

Power by Go Green (formerly PerfPower Corporation) is a technology company offering sustainable products, including batteries, flashlights, and extension cords/surge protectors. Their GoGreen Alkaline Batteries are made of recycled materials and can be recycled free-of-charge using the company’s iRecycled program. They are also free of toxic lead, cadmium, or mercury.

Call2Recycle Battery Stewardship Program

Call2Recycle is North America’s first and largest battery stewardship program that collects and recycles rechargeables free-of-charge in the U.S. and Canada. Since 1996, Call2Recycle has diverted more than 100 million pounds of rechargeable batteries and cell phones from landfills. Click Here to Update your Safety Training.

Research

The Story of Why We Need Safe Battery Management – CPSC, 3/8/22
Lithium Battery Fires Are Threatening Recycling as We Know It - VICE, 2/1/2022
An Analysis of Lithium-ion Battery Fires in Waste Management and Recycling – US EPA, July 2021
Recommendations for Tackling Fires Caused by Lithium Batteries in WEEE- WEEE Forum, July 2021
Reducing Lithium-Ion Battery Fires in Waste Facilities - Part Two- Waste360, 4/2/21
Battery Fire Report – CPSC, 3/18/21
4th Annual Reported Waste & Recycling Facility Fires US/CAN – Fire Rover, 03/2021
Managing Small Consumer Batteries - Part 2 - Waste Advantage Magazine, 2/3/21
Managing Small Consumer Batteries - Part 1 - Waste Advantage Magazine, 1/3/21
Short circuiting the circular economy – Resource Recycling, 6/19/19
Survey Results Regarding Fires in the Waste Management Industry – CPSC, 4/9/18

Mythbusters Jr. show illustrates the danger of putting batteries into our wastestream:

The Problem

According to CalRecycle’s 2018 Waste Characterization Study, nearly 630,000 tons of carpet was landfilled in California. It is bulky and difficult to manage and has the fourth largest greenhouse gas footprint of any product waste in California. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, every year 4 billion pounds of carpet are discarded in the U.S. and only about 1 percent is recycled.

Carpet Stewardship – California is the First in the World

In 2010, CPSC worked with carpet manufacturers, recyclers, the Carpet America Recovery Effort (CARE), and Assembly Speaker John Perez to pass the first product stewardship legislation to support the recycling of waste carpet, AB 2398. This legislation was not entirely successful, so warranted a new bill, AB 1158 sponsored by our national affiliate the National Stewardship Action Council (NSAC), to fix some issues. AB 1158 was signed by Governor Brown on October 14th, 2017. in 2019, NSAC sponsored a third bill amending the California carpet stewardship program, AB 729 (Chu). This legislation that paves the way for the state to reclaim over $15 million in carpet recycling fees used to support California carpet collection and recycling businesses, protecting its recycling infrastructure from the carpet recycling program administrator, Carpet America Recovery Effort (CARE), which is headquartered in Georgia. The bill added the requirement that differential assessments take into account the financial burden that a particular carpet material has on the stewardship program, and the amount of post-consumer recycled content contained in a particular carpet. This national precedent of "eco-modulated fees" will show the consumers which products are more recyclable and less toxic with a lower fee compared to the carpet types with a higher burden on the stewardship program achieving its legislated goals.

California Carpet Stewardship Advisory Committee (AC)

Carpet America Recovery Effort (CARE)

CARE is a joint industry-government effort to increase the amount of recycling and reuse of post-consumer carpet. CARE administers the California Carpet Stewardship Program, which is charged with meeting the requirements for carpet recycling set by AB 2398 and managed by CalRecycle. CARE’s 2017-2021 California Carpet Stewardship Program was rejected by CalRecycle many times for not meeting statutory requirements. On January 13, 2020, after approving CARE's Plan on the condition they achieve everything they included in the Approved Chapter 0 to the Plan. Pursuant to CalRecycle’s November 19, 2019, Request for Approval, CARE submitted timelines agreed upon by CalRecycle staff, that it shall meet to fulfill the remaining requirements of Chapter 0 and new statutory requirements established by the enactment of Assembly Bill 729.

However, CARE has not been making significant progress to increase recycling and CalRecycle has submitted an accusation and a possible fine of over $3 million for failure to meet the legislated standard of continuous and meaningful improvement. On December 19, 2017, CalRecycle concluded that CARE’s Annual Report for 2016 failed to demonstrate compliance with the carpet law, even after the Department found CARE non-compliant in 2014, 2015, and had requested CARE to implement changes. In February, 2018, CalRecycle agreed to lower civil penalties against CARE from $3.2 million to $1 million, but found CARE out of compliance again for the 2016 Annual Report for an additional $1.8 million in penalties. In June 2018, CalRecycle decided to delay enforcement of non-compliance for CARE until the decision is made regarding their final submission of the Carpet Stewardship Plan 2018-2022 in order to allow public consideration of the revised Plan. In March 2020, CalRecycle referred CARE to enforcement.

Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Safer Consumer Products

The Safer Consumer Products (SCP) program uses a four-step process to reduce toxic chemicals in the products that consumers buy and use. DTSC identifies specific products that contain potentially harmful chemicals and reviews safer alternatives. Carpets and rugs treated with PFASs for stain- or soil-resistance are potential long-term sources of widespread human and ecological exposures to this class of chemicals. In February 2018, DTSC released a Product-Chemical Profile for carpets and rugs with PFASs. In May 2020, DTSC proposed to adopt regulations listing Carpets and Rugs Containing PFAS as a Priority Product.

CPSC Coalition sign-on letter supporting DTSC's proposed regulations 5/15/20

Recycled Carpet Products and Market Development

There are many products on the market that use recycled carpet materials in their production. Here are some examples of companies leading the market in creating products that improve the market for carpet recycling.

Aquafil manufactures nylon from post-consumer recycled materials in their Eco-nyl product, used in many eco-fashion oriented products

Aquafil Carpet Recycling Facility: Tour and Interview Hosted by CPSC

DSM-Niaga creates fully recyclable carpet using their new glue technology

Interface Carpet manufacturers incorporate sustainability into their business and product design for carpet

Fiberon Composite decking uses post-consumer wood and plastic in their production process

Also:

SafePath and Sierra Rubber Products use recycled carpet and tires in their manufacturing process
DGS and CalRecycle Report to the Governor and the Legislature about carpet procurement standards in CA- 2014
If you know of other examples, please share with us! info@calpsc.org

Carpet Procurement Standards- San Francisco

San Francisco Department of the Environment adopted new sustainable carpet purchasing requirements into regulation that are among the strictest in the nation. It limits City purchases to certain, recycled, commercial, hard-backed carpet tiles because they allow for easy replacement and minimize waste.

Highlights of the regulation include a ban on these toxic chemicals in carpet tiles and broadloom (rolled) carpet:

Antimicrobial chemicals because they can make bacteria resistant to antibiotics and disrupt our hormones. It is not necessary for city department carpet to have antimicrobial chemicals.
Flame retardant chemicals because they do little, if anything, to slow or prevent fire. They migrate out of products and escape into our air, dust and our bodies. And they’re associated with cancer, lower intelligence quotient (IQ), and reproductive harm.
Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) because they are associated with cancer, high cholesterol and obesity. So San Francisco’s regulation requires carpets to have cationic nylon yarn. It is soil stain resistant and does not require toxic fluorinated chemicals.
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) because it usually has phthalates (some of which disrupt our hormones and probably causes cancer), and sometimes it has lead (which can cause reproductive problems and nerve disorders), and when PVC is made or disposed, it releases cancer-causing dioxins.

To learn more, watch this webinar on the San Francisco carpet procurement standards.

Carpet Procurement Standards- Woodland Unified School District

In 2017-2018, parents became alarmed when children were sickened after new carpet was installed in four classrooms at Beamer Park elementary. The trustees voted not to remove the carpet at Beamer Elementary on February 8, 2018, but the Woodland Coalition for Green Schools kept researching and organizing around the issue.

On 12/19/19, the Woodland Joint Unified School Trustees unanimously adopted a new sustainable floor policy that bans PFAS, lead, 4-PC, PBDEs, phthalates, and other hazardous chemicals commonly found in school carpets.

View the School District Carpet Procurement Policy
Coalition press release here.
Woodland SChhol District press release, too, here.

Articles & Press

Canary Science in the Mineshaft of the Anthropocene - Grandia, 09/01/21
Suspect Screening, Prioritization, and Confirmation of Environmental Chemicals in Maternal-Newborn Pairs from San Francisco- Environmental Science & Technology, 3/22/21
Regulating PFAS as a Chemical Class under the California Safer Consumer Products Program- DTSC, 2/2021
Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class- Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 6/12/20
Tackling carpet recycling head on- American Recycler, 5/6/2020
Consequences of Carpet Waste and the Push for Stewardship Programs - Waste360, 8/1/19
Dangerous wildfires show need to detoxify carpets – San Jose Mercury News, 1/26/2019
US Carpet EPR Toolkit– Eunomia, 1/24/19
Testing Carpet for Toxics: Chemicals affecting human health and hindering the circular economy– GAIA, 12/13/2018
Joint statement for a circular carpet sector– Zero Waste Europe, 12/5/18
Testing for Toxics: How chemicals in European carpets are harming health and hindering circular economy– Changing Markets, 10/2018
A Carpet Manufacturer’s Sustainability Story– Waste 360, 9/13/18
Toxics_in_Carpets in the European Union– Jessica Onyshko and Dr Rob Hewlett, Anthesis Consulting Group, 3/5/2018
Product-Chemical-Profile-PFAS-Carpets-and-Rugs – DTSC and CalEPA, 2/24/18
Household Dust as a Repository of Chemical Accumulation. Christoph Moscet et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1/31/18
Carpet recycling increases much needed landfill space – American Recycler, 12/1/17
Eliminating Toxics in Carpet: Lessons for the Future of Recycling – Healthy Building Network, 10/2017
Remove It and Roll It Up: How to Recycle Carpeting – The Californian, 10/14/17

Links

The Problem

Fluorescent lamps consume less electricity than conventional bulbs; however, mercury is the key element that makes them so efficient. Mercury is a toxin which can harm the nervous system, kidneys, and liver. Today, only two percent of CFLs are recycled in the U.S., and millions of lamps are discarded. However, when diverted from landfill, US EPA explains that “virtually all components of a fluorescent bulb can be recycled.” Most are crushed en route to landfills and incinerators, releasing mercury vapors that are inhaled by workers. Mercury residue in landfills forms methyl mercury gas, which is especially toxic. CalRecycle reports that an estimated 75 million fluorescent lamps and tubes are generated each year, which in total contains more than half a ton of mercury.

Supporting Fluorescent Lamp Stewardship

In a grant project with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), CPSC learned that nearly 50% of consumers and retailers were unaware of California’s mercury lamp disposal ban. Most consumers were unaware that the fluorescent lamps were hazardous, unaware of how to dispose of them properly, and they threw them in the trash out of convenience.

Articles & Press

Eye on the Environment | Unintended consequences from light bulb ban?- VC Reporter, 3/18/21
Case Study #3, Mercury Containing Household Products: Thermostats and Light Bulbs – Natural Resources Council of Maine, Product Stewardship Case Study
Next Steps for Toxic Mercury Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs: Manufacturer Responsibility for Collection, Disposal a Must – Product Policy Institute, Issue Backgrounder, 7/10/07
Manufacturer Take Back: The Next Step for Energy Efficient Lighting Products – Product Policy Institute, 5/5/07

Links

Not sure where to recycle your CFLs? Click here to find a location near you.

Little-Kamper-Tailgating-at-the-2014-Fos

Meet-the-Little-Kamper-Refillable-Propan

The Problem

One pound disposable propane gas cylinders (cylinders) power equipment used for camping, cooking, landscaping, heating, and a variety of other applications. There are 30 million cylinders sold in the U.S. each year and an estimate over four million in California alone. Once used, consumers must dispose of these cylinders and often improperly and at significant cost to local governments and parks. When consumers purchase a cylinder, 80 percent of the cost is for the cylinder itself and 20 percent is for the gas.

Cylinders are difficult to recycle and once discarded cannot be presumed to be empty. Even a small amount of propane gas under pressure is dangerous and presents a risk to sanitation workers. Typically, “empty cylinders” are not allowed in mixed recycling bins and are collected separately at parks, household hazardous waste facilities, and transfer stations and are then shipped to a processing facility that handles cylinder evacuation. Very rarely, as in the case of Santa Cruz County, a cylinder that is completely empty can be placed in the curbside mixed recycling cart so it is important to check with your local waste hauler for direction. It is expensive to remove remaining gas and ensure metals are recycled and costs about $1.25 to recycle each cylinder when they cost around $4.50 to buy one.

Refilling disposable one pound cylinders is illegal. On November 28, 2014, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) issued a safety alert, “Prohibited Refilling of DOT 39 Specification Cylinders” regarding refilling disposable cylinders. The alert strongly recommends that the general public not refill DOT 39 cylinders, and outlines fines. Additional information on California and Federal laws and regulations pertaining to the refill of disposable cylinders can be found here. The DOT also produced a propane safety video and poster to educate the public about the dangers of refilling single-use propane cylinders.

Disposable Cylinder Facts

In 2014, Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Park spent $2,656 and shipped 2,125 cylinders for proper handling and recycling.
According to the City of Sunnyvale between 2010 – 2013 more than 16,000 cylinders were processed through the SMaRT Station (where the trash for Sunnyvale, Mountain View and Palo Alto is processed before being landfilled), at a cost of over $144,000 to the cities for their proper disposal. SMaRT Station Gas Cylinder Fact Sheet.

Supporting Cylinder Stewardship

The ReFuel Your Fun and $ave! campaign was developed and is administered by CPSC, in conjunction with local government agencies and other partners, through a grant from CalRecycle. Click here for the ReFuel Your Fun website. Follow the ReFuel Your Fun Facebook page.

There is one manufacturer that redesigned the valves and now offer refillable one pound cylinders: Flame King. In addition, Kamps Propane stores are now selling and exchanging the Little Kamper refillable gas cylinders and Pick Up Propane locations will be exchanging the refillables beginning Spring 2015. These refillable cylinders save customers an average of $320 over their 12-year life span assuming a cylinder is reused 10 times a year either through refilling or an exchange program. Retailers, including Home Depot, REI, and Amazon, now offer reusables online. Check each site for availability.

Please ask retailers in your community to sell or provide refill or exchange services. Click here for a sample letter.

Research

The Best Refillable Propane Tank Options, Outside Online, July 13, 2020
Propane Tanks Wreak Havoc at MRFs and Disposal Sites, waste360, May 23, 2019
Beyond the Numbers Radio Show, Money 105.5 FM Wall Street Business Network, July 6, 2016
Campaign Targets Disposable Propane Tanks, Steve Milne, Capital Public Radio, June 3, 2016
CPSC Assistant Director Christine Flowers interviewed about ReFuel Your Fun on The Green and Sexy Radio Hour, May 25, 2016
California’s ‘Refuel Your Fun’ initiative could ease problems at MRFs – Linda Tufano, Waste Dive, August 2015
California Adds Fourth R – Refill – to Keep Propane Tanks Out of the Trash – Elizabeth McGowan, Waste 360, August 2015

Shown below:

Tailgater with the Little Kamper, Kamps Propane;

A little camper seen with the Little Kamper, Kamps Propane Website; and

Refillable one pound cylinders powering landscaping equipment.

The Problem

Mattresses are bulky and difficult to transport, and public access to inexpensive recycling opportunities is very limited, so illegal dumping of mattresses is a widespread problem. According to CalRecycle’s Mattress & Box Spring Case Study, an estimated 4.2 million mattresses and box springs are discarded annually in California, but less than 5 percent were being recycled at the time of the report.

Policy and Legislation for Mattresses in California

SB 254 (Hancock) was enacted in 2013 and aims to reduce illegal dumping, increase recycling, and substantially reduce public agency costs for the end-of-use management of used mattresses. The legislation requires industry to create a statewide recycling program to increase the recovery and recycling of mattresses at their end-of-use. The Program is administered by the Mattress Recycling Council (MRC) and funded through a $10.50 recycling fee collected from consumers at point-of-sale when a mattress or box spring is purchased. MRC runs the Bye Bye Mattress California program to meet program requirements and provide fee payers access to mattress recycling services. Since 2016, 5 million mattresses were collected as part of the Bye Bye Mattress program in California, which has saved 6 million cubic yards of landfill space.

SB 1274 (Hancock) was passed in 2014 to provide additional clarity regarding definitions, report submittals, and record keeping requirements. in 2019, AB 187 (Garcia) passed to add further improvements to the mattress stewardship program. Keeping jobs in California and the recycling industry is exactly why we need AB 187 passed this year. AB 187 protects jobs by ensuring the program is sustainably funded and there is no disruption in subsidy payments to the waste haulers and others if the stewardship organization ceases to operate. AB 187 further protects California jobs by prioritizing in-state processing. Four key areas this bill improves the original legislation:

Expanding the scope of the program to include futons and mattresses delivered by common carrier.
Setting program goals to establish metrics for consumer access.
Requiring the organization, to develop strategies for collecting used mattresses for recycling in areas and communities that face unique challenges associated with proper waste management such as poverty, language barriers, and illegal mattress dumping.
Establishing a “bridge plan” so if the stewardship organization is revoked for any reason, there is a process to bring the $40M+ of fee money back to CA to support our businesses and recycling infrastructure.

California Illegal Dumping Compensation Program for Mattresses and Box Springs

The MRC’s California Illegal Dumping Payment Program (IDPP) fund helps off-set costs associated with efforts to clean-up illegally dumped mattresses and box springs in California by providing qualifying urban and and rural local governments, participating permitted solid waste facilities and authorized solid waste operations payments for illegally dumped mattress and box springs collected from the public right-of-way. Visit the IDPP registration page or contact Mark Patti with MRC for more information.

Research

DSM-Niaga and Auping to Develop Fully Recyclable Mattresses– Newswire, 11/21/17
Waking Up to Mattress Recycling – Roger Guttentag, Resource Recycling Magazine, 6/2015
California Mattress Recycling Advisory Committee comments on the MRC 2017 Annual Report (7/19/18) and Revised Annual Report (11/14/18)
CalRecycle Meeting on MRC Fee drop, 9/19/18
CalRecycle GHG Mattress study, 5/2012

Links

Mattress Recycling Council website
Bye Bye Mattress – California, Connecticut, and Rhode Island mattress recycling program
operated by the Mattress Recycling Council

The Problem

According to CalRecycle, one third of the 66 million tons of solid waste generated by Californians each year is packaging! For many products, packaging is certainly important, as it helps contain and preserve the product and protect it during the transport process. Even so, excessive packaging needs to be replaced with more lightweight, reusable packaging designs. Aside from being wasteful, packaging often ends up as litter, harming our environment and oceans. In the US, over 41 million tons of paper and paperboard packaging were generated in 2017, while 14 million tons of plastic packaging were generated that same year.

Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Safer Consumer Products

The Safer Consumer Products (SCP) program uses a four-step process to reduce toxic chemicals in the products that consumers buy and use. DTSC identifies specific products that contain potentially harmful chemicals and reviews safer alternatives. Foodware treated with PFASs are potential long-term sources of widespread human and ecological exposures to this class of chemicals. On January 14, 2020, DTSC hosted a day-long public workshop on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), and their alternatives, in food packaging. The meeting, included presentations and panel discussion showing the evident dangers of PFAS and the availability of safer alternatives already on the market. San Francisco Department of the Environment shared results from a study testing foodware packaging for PFAS and several testing PFAS free, supporting the producers making foodware packaging without harmful chemicals.

Research

Maine Recycling Law Could Spark Wave of Policies Across US- Law360, 7/28/21
Deep Dive into Plastic Monomers, Additives, and Processing Aids- Environmental Science & Technology, 6/22/21
What We Waste- Reloop, April 2021
Rethinking and optimising plastic waste management under COVID-19 pandemic: Policy solutions based on redesign and reduction of single-use plastics and personal protective equipment- Science of the Total Environment, 6/30/20
Reusable containers safe during Covid-19 pandemic, experts say- The Guardian, 6/22/20
(EPR) model approach- Resa Dimino and Bryce Hesterman, Recycling Today, 5/18/20
With EPR bills frozen due to coronavirus in many states, proponents still see path forward- Waste Dive, 4/24/20
To Fix America's Broken Recycling System, State Want Companies To Foot The Bill- Time, 2/26/20

Links

The Problem

Consumers buy much more paint than they need. The U.S. EPA estimates that 10% of paint sold becomes waste. It is the single largest waste stream managed by local government household hazardous waste (HHW) programs. In 2008 it cost California $27 million dollars to manage the nearly 2 million gallons of leftover paint that were disposed.

Supporting Paint Stewardship

As a result of five years of hard work led by the California Product Stewardship Council, California became the first state in the nation with a permanent paint stewardship program. CPSC worked closely with the American Coatings Association to lay the foundation for a producer financed, designed and managed post-consumer paint recovery system. In 2010, the Governor of California approved AB 1343. California’s Paint Stewardship Program, PaintCare now has over 800 collection sites throughout the state. In FY2020, PaintCare collected over 3.5 million gallons of postconsumer paint and diverted 95% of that from landfill.

Click Here to Read CPSC’s Comment Letter on PaintCare’s 5 year Annual Report 12/11/17

Research